Sign Up for free or Log In if you already have an account to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts. User Info: Megabest User Info: nizam Megabest39 posted Which will be better???
The world may never know Stop buying Madden. User Info: Stankymoo. Either way, the Vita is getting a much needed FPS infusion that may finally help Sony sell more units. And a larger Vita install base would mean more developer interest which would ultimately lead to more great games! Whichever game is "better," doesn't really concern me. I plan on playing video games indefinitely. No industry "controversy" will ever break my attachment to the medium.
User Info: joelang Stankymoo posted User Info: Meijimasha This signature is false. User Info: tacohashi. With reports of pre-orders for Ghosts appearing to wane in comparison to a few of the more recent Call of Duty games, are people really even excited for it, or are they simply hooked on the nostalgia of it all?
While Ghosts is going to offer a good, in-depth multiplayer experience is it going to be enough? There are plenty of gamers that still love a long, involved single player experience, which depending on who you are you may find lacking for the franchise as a whole. However you may feel about the CoD series, Activision is still working hard to remain top dog in the military shooter arena.
Ghosts promises to bring the same great multiplayer experience and feeling that all of the CoD titles have had, and from the looks of it may be improving on it as much as they can without changing what it is that makes this game a favorite for so many gamers.
Next up on the chopping block is Battlefield 4. This franchise, in the grand scheme of things has really not changed all that drastically throughout the years. The core gameplay and experience has, however, largely remained the same. The scope and size of each of the games has increased with each release and allows for more character customization and vehicles, weapons and of course tactics.
Outside of the Bad Company sin-off titles though, the Battlefield franchise has always seemed to lack a good, in-depth single player story. The single player experience for the majority of the Battlefield games have always felt more like an extended tutorial sequence that really gave players the feel for the basics, like vehicle movements, a good feel for the variety of weapons and tactics.
The single player experience pretty much exists to prepare the gamer for the multiplayer portion of the game. Killzone: Shadow Fall is kind of the odd man out compared to the other two games.
While their competition is either making games that resemble current military, and political conflicts within our world, the Killzone Developers have moved well passed all of that and just made their own conflicts within a fictional setting. This science fiction focus certainly helps this first person shooter stand out from the crowd. Guerrilla Games has made it a point to focus on the single player experience in not only their newest title, but in every one of the previous Killzone games, so there is plenty of story continuity and references to the previous titles.
With that said though, the multiplayer experience is certainly not lacking either and can easily compete with other, similar titles. User Info: Spartan User Info: SnoicFactor.
KZ fails terribly in the gameplay part. Slow and sluggish mess. Definitely Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare. Shadow Fall is a visual feast but damn it's very boring to play. Multiplayer is currently on life support. Hardly anyone plays online nowadays on Shadow Fall. Advanced Warfare is quite good. Singleplayer is all right, only takes about 5 hours to beat. Multiplayer is similar to any CoD game but it's very, very active and fun to play. User Info: stage4saiyan. Killzone is awful. I had it for about 2 days before selling it back to the store.
AW is better, and feels relatively fresh. CoD, but Killzone gets bashed much more than it deserves imo. R7 3.
0コメント